◎ Discry Score
unblocked.com
devtools · API
B
0 / 100
DISCOVERY0
COMPREHENSION0
Category leader: 96 (A)
Discry your API →
DEVTOOLS · RANK #8 OF 39

Unblocked is Good to agents.

Discry independently scored how well an AI agent can discover and understand the Unblocked API from what’s public — not whether it’s usable. Below: every signal we checked, what’s costing the score, and what to change.

Discry your API — freeView the docs ↗

SCORED UNDER RUBRIC 1.2 · A full re-launch under Discry Score 2.5 — a new behavioral instrument, not comparable to these scores — is in progress.

Discovery

45% of score · 81/100
OpenAPI specA machine-readable OpenAPI/Swagger spec agents can parse.Pass
llms.txtAn llms.txt index that points agents to the docs that matter.Pass
llms.txt qualityThe llms.txt is focused, current, and well under the size budget.Partial
llms-full.txtA full-text bundle agents can load in one request.Pass
AGENTS.mdAn AGENTS.md that tells coding agents how to build on the API.Fail
.well-known/mcp.jsonA discoverable MCP manifest at a well-known path.Pass
MCP registryThe API is listed in a public MCP registry.Pass
robots.txt AI directivesrobots.txt allows (or explicitly guides) AI crawlers.Pass
SitemapA sitemap so agents can enumerate the docs surface.Pass

Comprehension

55% of score · 96/100
Task-oriented descriptionsEndpoints described by what they accomplish, not just their shape.Pass
Realistic examplesRunnable, real-world request/response examples.Pass
Multi-step workflowsDocs that chain calls into complete jobs an agent can follow.Pass
Error-recovery guidanceDocumented failure modes and how to recover from them.Partial
Answer-first formatThe answer leads; preamble does not bury it.Pass
Capability boundariesClear limits — what the API can and cannot do.Pass
Naming consistencyConsistent, predictable naming across endpoints.Pass
Heading hierarchyClean heading structure agents can navigate.Pass
Markdown docsDocs available as clean markdown, not JS-rendered HTML only.Pass
Token efficiencyDocs are concise enough to fit an agent context window.Pass

What we found

  • An agent looking for this API would find it effortlessly: docs and marketing robots.txt explicitly allow-list every major AI crawler (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot) and carry Content-Signal ai-input=yes, and a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec sits at a predictable path (getunblocked.com/api/v1/public-api.json).
  • An agent could go from zero to a working integration using only the docs: the quickstart chains a complete workflow (create token → create collection → add document → ask question → poll for answer) with copy-pasteable, realistically-valued examples.
  • Capability boundaries are unusually explicit — an agent knows the hard limits up front (25 collections/team, 10MB/request, 1,000 questions/day, midnight-PST quota reset, field-length constraints) instead of discovering them by failing.
  • There's an official Unblocked MCP server (listed on PulseMCP and declared in .well-known/mcp.json), so agents have a native tool-calling path, not just REST — plus every doc page is retrievable as clean markdown via Mintlify .md URLs, llms.txt, and a 364KB llms-full.txt.
  • The gaps an agent would feel: no AGENTS.md for coding-agent context, and error docs stop at 'returns 429' without telling an agent to honor Retry-After or how to recover — self-correction guidance is thin.

What to change

Prioritized by impact on discoverability. You (or your docs platform) deploy these — Discry never touches your API.

  1. 01Add error-recovery guidance: for each documented error (especially 429), state the concrete recovery step (e.g., 'wait until the quota resets at midnight PST' or honor a Retry-After header) so agents self-correct instead of hard-failing — this is the biggest comprehension lever remaining.
  2. 02Publish an AGENTS.md in the primary public repo (github.com/unblocked/skills) with API base URL, auth, and rate-limit context for coding agents — a 3-weight discovery gap and a quick win.
  3. 03Add an API-focused llms.txt (or /api-reference/llms.txt) that indexes only the API surface rather than the current product-wide index that mixes billing, SSO, and data-source pages — sharpens token efficiency for agents that only want to call the API.
  4. 04Expose and document rate-limit response headers (e.g., X-RateLimit-Remaining, Retry-After) so agents can throttle proactively rather than reactively.
  5. 05Point .well-known/mcp.json at a branded production MCP URL rather than the Mintlify preview host (unblocked.main-kill-isr.mintlify.me) to signal stability to agent runtimes.

Execution coverage · INFORMATIONAL, UNSCORED

Whether an agent can actually complete a call and recover from errors is the deeper Audit layer — documented here, but not part of the Discry Score.

Bearer API token (Personal Access Token)Bearer API token (Team Access Token) Error format documented Rate limits documented Pagination documented Idempotency documented

Auth is Bearer API tokens (Personal + Team), documented with scoping and daily call limits. Errors are machine-parseable JSON with documented status codes (204/429/etc.) via the OpenAPI spec; rate limits and quotas are explicitly documented (1,000 questions/day, midnight-PST reset, 429 on overage) though rate-limit response header names aren't specified. Pagination is cursor-based via RFC-5988 link headers (before/after, limit 1-200). No formal idempotency-key mechanism, but PUT endpoints give natural upsert idempotency (documents keyed by uri, answers by client-supplied UUID questionId).

See your own Discry Score.

Drop your API docs URL. See what an agent sees — in 60 seconds, free.

Discry your API — free